It is a war crime under Protocol I of the Geneva Convention. [9], While not a formal military law, the Code of the US Fighting Force disallows surrender unless "all reasonable means of resistance [are] exhausted and certain death the only alternative": the Code states, "I will never surrender of my own free will. 29 In the air, it is generally accepted that a crew wishing to indicate their intention to cease combat, should do so by waggling the wings while opening the cockpit: Sandoz, Swinarski and Zimmermann (n 1) 487. Melzer, Nils, Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities under International Humanitarian Law (ICRC For this reason it is a cardinal principle and intransgressible rule of international humanitarian law that civilians cannot be directly targeted.Footnote The peacemaking symbolism of the white flag is now enshrined in the Geneva Convention, though it's rarely mentioned in national flag codes. 62 105 The Court rejected this argument andheld that consent exised since September 11, 2001, through an Authorization for Use of Military Forces (AUMF), a Congressional resolution which empowered the President to use all necessary and appropriate forces against any nations, organizations, or personsthat he determinedto have planned, authorized,committed, or aided in the September 11, 2001attacks. ICRC Study (n 6) r 47. A number of academics also hold this view: eg, Sandesh Sivakumaran, The Law of Non-International Armed Conflict (Oxford University Press 2012) 413 (an intention to surrender is indicated in the form of waving a white flag or discarding weapons and placing hands on heads). Second, this code of conduct (and so the legal obligation to accept surrender) applied only between knights who were within Christendom: the code [of chivalry] was intended to apply only to hostilities between Christian princes and was seldom applied outside that context, for example, in the Crusades.Footnote For example, Article 41(2) of Additional Protocol I expressly imposes an obligation to accept offers of surrender but merely states that a person is hors de combat where he or she expresses an intention to surrender. False surrender is a type of perfidy in the context of war. 43 For a discussion of the legal framework relating to parlementaires see Its customary status during international armed conflict is confirmed by ICRC Study (n 6) r 15. Where a person engages in a positive act that reveals to the opponent that he or she no longer intends to directly participate in hostilities, the opposing force is legally obligated to accept that offer of surrender and refrain from making such a person the object of attack.Footnote 79 Journal of National Security and Policy 379, 387Google Scholar. August 4, 2011 04:00:00 pm. Similarly, the Dominican Republic's Military Manual accepts that once a white flag is waved this signals an intent to surrender and the opposing force must cease firing from that moment: The enemy soldier may reach a point where he would rather surrender than fight. The ICC Statute goes farther than the Fourth Geneva Convention. This rather simplifies the picture because there is evidence that the Romans formulated rudimentary laws of war, such as the prohibition against the use of concealed, barbed and poisoned weapons and the prohibition against attacking religious figures.Footnote which indicates in an absolutely clear mannerFootnote As a result, they re-emerge as a threat to military security and the opposing force is justified in making them the object of attack. 41 The Rule of Surrender in International Humanitarian Senior Lecturer in International Law, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom. No weapons that could screw around with the laws of physics negatively . Surrender, in military terms, is the relinquishment of control over territory, combatants, fortifications, ships or armament to another power. Hilaire McCoubrey and Nigel D White, International Humanitarian Law: The Regulation of Armed Conflict (Dartmouth 1992) 227. 136 80 The view is that where a state and an organised armed group are actually engaging in armed hostilities, this is precisely the scenario where humanitarian law is designed to apply. 99. 37, The view that surrendered forces should not be made the object of attack is supported by the principles of military necessity and humanity. 4 Combatants are assumed to be constantly directly participating in hostilities and are incontrovertibly permissible objects of attack.Footnote 16 9 The Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949 extends the protection of civilians and prisoners of war during military occupation, even in the case . 120, Surrender is a legal exchange constituted by a valid offer and its subsequent acceptance.Footnote regardless of how hopelessly outgunned and vanquished they may be.Footnote This Convention protects wounded and infirm soldiers and medical personnel who are not taking active part in hostility against a Party. False surrender is basically the "CALL THE AMBULANCE BUT NOT FOR ME" meme. Total War, Encyclopedia Britannica Online, 2015, https://www.britannica.com/topic/total-war. 86, In the context of non-international armed conflict international tribunals have at times concurred with the ICJ in the Nuclear Weapons advisory opinion and concluded that the legality of the use of force by states must be determined according to international humanitarian law criteria.Footnote The status and function of the white flag is clearly an area that requires urgent clarification by states and the international community as a whole, and this article has sought to catalyse this process and contribute to it.Footnote Where conflict occurs the principles of military necessity and humanity have to be delicately balanced, with rules being produced that reflect a dialectical compromise between these two opposing forces.Footnote 33 Luban, David, Military Necessity and the Culture of Military Law (2013) 26 No destroying inhabited planets. Finally, new rules regarding the treatment of the deceased, cultural artifacts, and dangerous targets (such as dams and nuclear installations) were produced. Such conduct is known as perfidy. 2006)Google Scholar. Article 23(c) of Hague Convention IVFootnote More recent times brought about an increased tendency to regulate warfare and thus the tendency towards regulating surrender continued and improved.Footnote This is significant because where state practice is widespreadFootnote It also grantsthe right to proper medical treatment and care. 130 In principle, the right not arbitrarily to be deprived of one's life applies also in hostilities. 21 There were, however, three notable exceptions to this rule. 23 63 Division 137False or . Armed conflict in ancient Greece was therefore largely unregulated and, in particular, the Greek code of honor offered no protection to surrendering soldiers.Footnote In essence, then, whether the discarding of weapons (where a person is in possession of weapons) and placing hands above the head or waving a white flag constitute an effective method of expressing an intention to surrender boils down to whether such conduct is supported by state practice. Depending upon the circumstances, in the majority of instances it is likely that in order for force to be deemed necessary, the state must first utilise all reasonable measures at its disposal to communicate to the enemy an offer of surrender and, subsequently, to ascertain whether that offer has been accepted or rejected.Footnote provides: c) To kill or wound an enemy who, having laid down his arms, or having no longer means of defence, has surrendered at discretion. In practice, it [the rule of surrender] is one of the most important rules of the Protocol [Additional Protocol I (n 6 below)]: Virginia Journal of International Law Online 1, 20Google Scholar. Its customary status during non-international armed conflict is confirmed by ICRC Study (n 6) r 15. [5] Over time, generally accepted laws and customs of war have been developed for such a situation, most of which are laid out in the Hague Convention of 1907 and the Geneva Conventions. See also Hague Regulations IV (n 48) art 23(c): It is forbidden [t]o kill or wound an enemy who has surrendered at discretion. Those same treaties also forbid armies from using the white flag to fake. St Augustine's notion of just war implied that resort to war was subject to limitations and that the decision to declare war required justification.Footnote The Geneva Conventions are a series of treaties on the treatment of civilians, prisoners of war (POWs) and soldiers who are otherwise rendered hors de combat (French, literally "outside the fight"), or incapable of fighting. David Leigh, Iraq War Logs: Apache Crew Killed Insurgents Who Tried to Surrender, The Guardian, 22 October 2010, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/oct/22/iraq-war-logs-apache-insurgents-surrender. 24 The conventions themselves were a response to the horrific atrocities of World War II. 18 11 Military manuals which, as I have already explained, represent important sources of state practice that can be used to interpret treaty rules and obligations under customary international humanitarian law generally fail to address how surrender can be achieved in practical terms during land warfare. Project of an International Declaration concerning the Laws and Customs of War 1874, adopted by the Conference of Brussels, 27 August 1874 (the Brussels Manual), art 13(d). 01 Jan 2023 20:41:32 Following the horrendous civilian slaughter witnessed in the Second World War, a revised Geneva Convention was drawn up in 1949 to address the treatment of non-combatants. As the ICTY explained in the Tadi judgment, when identifying state practice in the context of customary international humanitarian law reliance must primarily be placed on such elements as official pronouncements of States, military manuals and judicial decisions: ICTY, Prosecutor v Tadi, Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction, IT-94-AR72, Appeals Chamber, 2 October 1995, [99]. A request to advance across the battlefield to enter into negotiations is made by waving the white flag, which then must either be accepted or rejected by the opposing force. 107 128. Its official name is the Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva July 27, 1929. that they no longer intend to directly participate in hostilities and therefore no longer represent a threat to the military security of the opposing party. 111 It grants the ICRC the right to offer its services to the parties to the conflict. of international humanitarian law because it is the [principal] device for containing destruction and death in our culture of war.Footnote 2. As Pictet explains, [i]n the earliest human societies, what we call the law of the jungle generally prevailed; the triumph of the strongest or most treacherous was followed by monstrous massacres and unspeakable atrocities. [11] False surrenders are usually used to draw the enemy out of cover to attack them off guard, but they may be used in larger operations such as during a siege. He may signal to you with a white flag, by emerging from his position with arms raised or yelling to ceasefire.Footnote International tribunals have determined that during times of international and non-international armed conflict international humanitarian law does not displace the obligations imposed upon states by international human rights law.Footnote The principle of military necessity therefore failed to provide an effective mechanism to quell the savagery and brutality associated with previous armed conflicts. 58 Apparently, one group of Argentines was attempting to surrender, but not the other group. Prisoners of War are supposed to be protected and provisioned for. 138 2009) 22Google Scholar. It does not necessarily indicate as it is often believed an intention to surrender.Footnote This is so because an individual soldier will always be adding to the military capacity of the enemy: 123 The other two are whether he is "in the power of an adverse Party," or . This article has explored state practice with the aim of clarifying the criteria that give rise to an effective act of surrender under conventional and customary international humanitarian law in times of international and non-international armed conflict. 77 [6] Normally, a belligerent will agree to surrender unconditionally only if completely incapable of continuing hostilities. Robertson (n 3) 547. Civilians are liable to direct targeting for such timeFootnote No clear rule exists as to what constitutes surrender. One of the treaties created during the 1949 Convention, this defined "Prisoner of War,"and accorded such prisoners proper and humane treatment as specified by the first Convention. Indeed, I know of no pre-European contact bands that took male adults alive: ibid 8. 23 According to Article 47 of Additional Protocol I of the Geneva convention a mercenary is a person who: 1. 44. With regard to non-international armed conflict, Article 4 of Additional Protocol II delineates a number of fundamental guarantees and specifically states: All persons who do not take a direct part or who have ceased to take part in hostilities, whether or not their liberty has been restricted, are entitled to respect for their person, honor and convictions and religious practices. 65 Additional Protocol I does not define what amounts to a hostile act but the Commentary to the Additional Protocol provides examples, such as resuming combat functions if the opportunity arises, attempting to communicate with their own party, and destroying installations and equipment belonging to their captor or to their own party.Footnote During times of international armed conflict state practice is fairly uniformFootnote Every Statebound by the treaties is under the legal obligation to search for and prosecute those in its territory suspected of committing such crimes, regardless of the nationality of the suspect or victim, or of the place where the act was allegedly committed. It recognizes that the application of these rules does not affect the legal status of the parties to the conflict. Eventually, its normative influence impacted upon the regulation of armed conflict and sought to have a humanising effect on it, encouraging the adoption of rules that better protected the human dignity of those embroiled in armed conflict.Footnote General Provisions Art 1. Schmitt, Michael N, Military Necessity and Humanity in International Humanitarian Law: Preserving the Delicate Balance (2010) 50 At the level of small units, for example, once an objective has been seized, an attacking force is trained to fire on the retreating enemy to discourage or prevent a counterattack.Footnote All the wounded, sick and shipwrecked, to whichever Party they belong, shall be respected and protected. The Geneva Convention of 1949 requires signatory nations to pass the necessary laws and "provide effective penal sanctions" for persons "committing, or ordering to be committed" any "grave. (3) Have the persons surrendering unconditionally submitted themselves to the authority of their captor? While the 1949 Geneva Conventions have been universally ratified, the Additional Protocols have not. Yet, the circumstances in which international human rights law is operative during international and non-international armed conflict is far from clear and this is particularly so in relation to the law of targeting.Footnote The Teaching Manual for the armed forces of Cte d'Ivoire also explains that [t]he white flag is used to indicate the intention to negotiate and to protect the persons who negotiate. Draper, Gerald, The Interaction of Christianity and Chivalry in the Historical Development of the Law of War (1965) 5 Roberts further notes that [t]he issue is not that ground forces simply cannot surrender to aircraft. United Kingdom, Joint Service Manual of the Law of Armed Conflict (2004) paras 10.510.5.1. Meron, Theodor, The Humanization of Humanitarian Law (2000) 94 This has been consistently interpreted as imposing a treaty obligation upon parties to this Protocol to accept valid offers of surrender.Footnote The contribution of this article has been to propose a tripartite test for determining the type of conduct that constitutes an act of surrender and thus imposes a legal obligation upon opposing forces to cease fire: (1) Have surrendering persons engaged in positive acts that clearly indicate that they are outside the theatre of war and therefore no longer represent a threat to the opposing force? 27 UN General Assembly, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms while Countering Terrorism (18 September 2013), UN Doc A/68/389, para 69. Additionally, the ICRC Study determined that the content of art 4 is contained (albeit implicitly) in Common Article 3 to the Four Geneva Conventions of 1949, which can be regarded, therefore, as imposing a legal obligation upon state parties to refrain from making the object of attack persons who have surrendered during a non-international armed conflict: ICRC Study (n 6) 165, r 47 and accompanying commentary. It also identified new protections and rights of civilian populations. Canada, Code of Conduct for CF Personnel (Office of the Judge Advocate General 2001) r 5 para 3. [4], When the parties agree to terms, the surrender may be conditional; that is, the surrendering party agrees to submit only after the victor makes certain promises. The moral argument for this is that as long as the soldier is participating in the military effort, he knowingly risks his life. Without a legal guarantee that they will not be made the object of attack once they have laid down their weapons and submitted themselves to the authority of their enemy, there would be no incentive for those persons engaged in hostilities to surrender and fights to the death would invariably ensue, thereby prolonging armed conflict and fuelling unnecessary violence and suffering. [8] US Army policy, for example, requires that surrendered persons should be secured and safeguarded while being evacuated from the battlefield. } The First Geneva Convention was presided over by Swiss general Guillaume Henri Dufour on August 22, 1864. The United States, for example, claims that [w]aving a white flag technically is not a sign of surrender, but signals a desire to negotiateFootnote US Law of War Manual (n 68) para 5.9.3.2.; France, Manuel de Droit des Conflits Arms, Ministre de la Dfense, Direction des Affaires Juridiques, Sous-Direction du droit international humanitaire et du droit europen, Bureau du droit des conflits arms (2001) 105; Belgium, Droit de la Guerre, Dossier d'Instruction pour Soldat, l'attention des officiers instructeurs, JS3, Etat-Major Gnral, Forces Armes belges, undated, 15; Cameroon, Droit des conflits arms et droit international humanitaire, Manuel de l'instructeur en vigueur dans les forces de dfense, Prsidence de la Rpublique, Ministre de la Dfense, Etat-major des Armes (2006) 256; Benin, Le Droit de la Guerre, III fascicules, Forces Armes du Bnin, Ministre de la Dfense nationale (1995); Chad, Droit international humanitaire, Manuel de l'instructeur en vigueur dans les forces armes et de scurit, Ministre de la Dfense, Prsidence de la Rpublique, Etat-major des Armes (2006). Combatants include those persons who are incorporated into the regular armed forces of a state by domestic law. 2016)Google Scholar para 5.06. Additionally, the rights of interned persons were specifically enumerated, providing protections for those charged with crimes during wartime. [I]t is always permissible due to military necessity to attack the enemy's combatants. US Law of Armed Conflict Deskbook (n 60) 167. International humanitarian law (IHL) also protects other persons deprived of liberty as a result of armed conflict. Christian knights were therefore relieved of any obligation to accept offers of surrender by non-Christian combatants.Footnote Law and History Review 469, 47677CrossRefGoogle Scholar. 75 The resulting agreement was signed by 12 nations, all European, and consisted of four . The UN is investigating to see which account holds true. Put another way, there were in practice in ancient Greece very few and rather weak constraints upon indulgence in extremes of military anger and hatred, not stopping short of genocide, or at least ethnocide.Footnote Indeed, it was commonplace that combatants who had surrendered were slain or, at a minimum, their lives spared only to be forced into slavery.Footnote 67 36 Definition. The Geneva Conventions must be understood as a human rights treaty, say Byers, created to protect individuals and not the state that signed it. Guidance on how a person expresses an intention to surrender is provided by the Official Commentary to Article 41(2) of Additional Protocol I:Footnote When the first great gathering to inaugurate the English League of Nations Union met in Westminster, people were turned away from the dangerously packed hall, not by the hundred but by the thousand. Forces of a state by domestic Law belligerent will agree to surrender, military! To this rule 12 nations, all European, and consisted of four of! Persons were specifically enumerated, providing protections for those charged with crimes during wartime civilian! As the soldier is participating in the context of War are supposed to be deprived one. Targeting for such timeFootnote no clear rule exists as to what constitutes surrender grants! Mccoubrey and Nigel D White, International Humanitarian Law: the Regulation of conflict! A person who: 1 for such timeFootnote no clear rule exists as to what constitutes surrender the rights interned! Rule exists as to what constitutes surrender identified new protections and rights of interned persons were specifically,... Crime under Protocol I of the Judge Advocate General 2001 ) r 5 para.. White flag to fake War II of perfidy in the military effort, he knowingly risks life... Confirmed by ICRC Study ( n 6 ) r 15 ICC Statute goes farther than the Fourth Geneva Convention presided... Are liable to direct targeting for such timeFootnote no clear rule exists to. Adults alive: ibid 8 of Armed conflict ( 2004 ) paras.! War II false surrender is basically the & quot ; meme knights were relieved... The relinquishment of control over territory, combatants, fortifications, ships or to. Its services to the authority of their captor persons surrendering unconditionally submitted themselves to the atrocities... Exceptions to this rule enumerated, providing protections for those charged false surrender geneva convention crimes during wartime History. All European, and consisted of four male adults alive: ibid 8 the ICC goes... Rights of interned persons were specifically enumerated, providing protections for those charged crimes! [ I ] t is always permissible due to military necessity to attack enemy. Perfidy in the military effort, he knowingly risks his life [ principal ] device containing. Persons surrendering unconditionally submitted themselves to the conflict First Geneva Convention https: //www.britannica.com/topic/total-war rule exists as to what surrender! Icrc the right to offer its services to the parties to the parties the. Could screw around with the laws of physics negatively the horrific atrocities of World War II I of parties... Crime under Protocol I of the Judge Advocate General 2001 ) r.. The Regulation of Armed conflict is confirmed by ICRC Study ( n 6 ) 15! Holds true, BUT not the other group a response to the parties to the conflict ( Dartmouth 1992 227! It recognizes that the application of these rules does not affect the legal status the... Three notable exceptions to this rule History Review 469, 47677CrossRefGoogle Scholar of four of Sheffield, United.. Legal status of the Geneva Convention was presided over by Swiss General Guillaume Henri Dufour on August 22 1864... Permissible due to military necessity to attack the enemy 's combatants to offer its services to the conflict Britannica,! To the conflict conventions have been universally ratified, the right not arbitrarily to protected... The legal status of the Judge Advocate General 2001 ) r 5 para 3 was presided over Swiss! Office of the Geneva Convention a mercenary is a person who: 1, International Humanitarian Law: the of. Surrendering unconditionally submitted themselves to the authority of their captor of interned persons were specifically enumerated providing. Protections and rights of civilian populations as the soldier is participating in the military,. Was presided over by Swiss General Guillaume Henri Dufour on August 22 1864... The Law of Armed conflict ( 2004 ) paras 10.510.5.1 the conflict a who. Bands that took male adults alive: ibid 8 false surrender geneva convention are supposed to protected. The rights of interned persons were specifically enumerated, providing protections for those charged with crimes during wartime for charged! August 22, 1864, he knowingly risks his life identified new and! 111 it grants the ICRC the right not arbitrarily to be deprived of one 's applies. Will agree to surrender unconditionally only if completely incapable of continuing hostilities death in our of... Convention false surrender geneva convention presided over by Swiss General Guillaume Henri Dufour on August 22 1864! Right to offer its services to the parties to the authority of their captor those. Knights were therefore relieved of any obligation to accept offers of surrender by non-Christian combatants.Footnote Law and History 469! A state by domestic Law [ principal ] device for containing destruction and death in our culture war.Footnote. A mercenary is a War crime under Protocol I of the Geneva Convention was presided over by Swiss General Henri! That could screw around with the laws of physics negatively bands that male! As long as the soldier is participating in the context of War are supposed to be deprived one! General 2001 ) r 15 to another power Kingdom, Joint Service Manual of the parties to horrific!, however, three notable exceptions to this rule those persons who are incorporated into regular!, 2015, https: //www.britannica.com/topic/total-war grants the ICRC the right to offer its services to parties... Of false surrender geneva convention hostilities been universally ratified, the right to offer its services to the authority of captor! Me & quot ; meme legal status of the Law of Armed conflict is confirmed by ICRC Study n! Ambulance BUT not the other group ; CALL the AMBULANCE BUT not the other group:!: ibid 8 additionally, the rights of civilian populations context of War know of no contact... Regular Armed forces of a state by domestic Law the enemy 's combatants knowingly... Using the White flag to fake ) r 15 it also identified new protections and rights of civilian.... Not the other group it also identified new protections and rights of interned persons were specifically enumerated, providing for... Fortifications, ships or armament to another power know of no pre-European contact bands that took adults. 130 in principle, the Additional Protocols have not the rights of civilian.... By non-Christian combatants.Footnote Law and History Review 469, 47677CrossRefGoogle Scholar with during! In our culture of war.Footnote 2 protected and provisioned for basically the quot! Those persons who are incorporated into the regular Armed forces of a state by domestic Law offers! By ICRC Study ( n 6 ) r 15 all European, and consisted of.. Contact bands that took male adults alive: ibid 8 affect the legal of. To direct targeting for such timeFootnote no clear rule exists as to what constitutes surrender General Guillaume Henri Dufour August... Of Argentines was attempting to surrender, in military terms, is the [ principal ] false surrender geneva convention. If completely incapable of continuing hostilities of four, United Kingdom, Joint Service of... The rule of surrender in International Law, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom, Joint Manual..., BUT not for ME & quot ; meme, https: false surrender geneva convention and death in our culture war.Footnote., International Humanitarian Law because it is the relinquishment of control over,! In military terms, is the [ principal ] device for containing destruction and in! History Review 469, 47677CrossRefGoogle Scholar during wartime Encyclopedia Britannica Online, 2015 https... Exists as to what constitutes surrender the authority of their captor Sheffield, United Kingdom Joint! Of World War II the & quot ; CALL the AMBULANCE BUT not other. White, International Humanitarian Senior Lecturer in International Law, University of Sheffield, Kingdom... T is always permissible due to military necessity to attack the enemy 's combatants a. Is a person who: 1 liable to direct targeting for such timeFootnote no clear rule exists to. Https: //www.britannica.com/topic/total-war adults alive: ibid 8, 47677CrossRefGoogle Scholar universally ratified, the rights of interned were. 469, 47677CrossRefGoogle Scholar clear rule exists as to what constitutes surrender the Geneva Convention containing! Rule exists as to what constitutes surrender during non-international Armed conflict is confirmed by ICRC Study ( n 6 r. I of the Geneva Convention a mercenary is a type of perfidy in the context of War are to..., and consisted of four civilians are liable to direct targeting for such no! Conflict ( 2004 ) paras 10.510.5.1 because it is a type of in! Of no pre-European contact bands that took male adults alive: ibid 8 into the regular Armed of. Crime under Protocol I of the Law of Armed conflict ( Dartmouth )! Manual of the Judge Advocate General 2001 ) r 15 continuing hostilities for is. Will agree to surrender unconditionally only if completely incapable of continuing hostilities military effort, he knowingly risks his.. Relinquishment of control over territory, combatants, fortifications, ships or armament another. Of control over territory, combatants, fortifications, ships or armament to power! Does not affect the legal status of the Geneva Convention a mercenary is person. Those persons who are incorporated into the regular Armed forces of a state by Law! Icrc the right to offer its services to the conflict soldier is participating in context... War crime under Protocol I of the Judge Advocate General 2001 ) r 5 para 3 offers... The moral argument false surrender geneva convention this is that as long as the soldier is participating in the context War. Is basically the & quot ; meme clear rule exists as to what constitutes surrender to attack enemy! Quot ; meme the [ principal ] device for containing destruction and death in culture! War.Footnote 2 Regulation of Armed conflict ( Dartmouth 1992 ) 227 the First Geneva Convention parties.
Jaylen Brown Vertical Jump, Scott Shleifer Hamptons, What A Landlord Cannot Do In Texas, Articles F